LEGAL INFORMATION SYSTEM POLICY ANALYSIS HEALTH IN INDONESIA

Abstract

The resolution of malpractice cases in Indonesia is very ambiguous and  confusing, not only for legal practitioners but also for ordinary people. How not, every time there is an alleged malpractice experienced by a patient, the patient is also confused about who and where to report this case, especially when there is no accompanying lawyer. What if the alleged malpractice is experienced by a patient whose standard of living is classified as poor, just go to the hospital using ASKESKIN (health
insurance for the poor) where it is possible to pay a lawyer to file a lawsuit against a doctor or hospital. There are two processes for resolving malpractice cases, the first by way of litigation, namely according to legal procedures submitted to legal institutions or ethical institutions, the second by non-litigation, namely solving problems through alternative channels with family deliberation. It may even be necessary to have a special court (ad hoc court), or a special institution formed by a special government to resolve all problems related to malpractice using deliberation