DEVELOPMENT OF A RISK BEHAVIOR DIAGNOSTIC QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ANEMIA IN WOMEN OF REPRODUCTIVE AGE
Bilah Samping Artikel
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
The fact that anemia symptoms are sometimes perceived as mild and non disruptive has led adolescents to be less concerned and appear to take it lightly. The aim of this study was to develop a questionnaire for the risk behavior diagnosis for anemia in women of reproductive age. A direct order from a husband is generally something that pregnant women cannot refuse. There is no validated questionnaire for risk behavior diagnosis for anemia in women of reproductive age in Indonesia. Based on the Extended Parallel Processing Model (EPPM), an initial questionnaire was prepared with 60 statement items divided into 6 constructs, namely: Perceived severity, Perceived susceptibility, Self efficacy, Response efficacy, Danger control responses, and Fear control responses. The initial questionnaire was tested for content validity by involving 10 experts in the fields of nursing, public health, and psychology. Using the content validity ratio and content validity index, 43 items were produced with a
content validity ratio value above 0.62 and a content validity index value above 0.78. Five women of reproductive age were included in the cognitive interview session after the questionnaire modification was carried out. This questionnaire
can be used as the primary subject for further factor analysis. The developed items are the result of ongoing research, and it is hoped that this questionnaire will be a robust instrument that can be used elsewhere.
Rincian Artikel
Referensi
Ayre. C.. & Scally. A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 47(1). 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
Brod. M.. Tesler. L. E.. & Christensen. T. L. (2009). Qualitative Research And Content Validity: Developing Best Practices Based On Science And Experience. Quality of Life Research. 18(9). 1263–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9
Delgado-Rico. E.. Carrctero-Dios. H.. & Rueh. W. (2012). Content validity evidences in test development: An applied perspective. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 12(3). 449–460. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/337/33723713006.pdf
Djati. I. S.. Nugraheni. S. A.. & Sriatmi. A. (2025). Factors Influencing Attitude Making in The Prevention of Anemia in Female Adolescent: A scoping review. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi. 6(1). 590–610. https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v6i1.8901
Emilia. E.. Mulyana. R.. & Rosmiati. R. (2020). Promoting Balanced Nutrition Guidelines among adolescent: evaluation of the nutrition posters and stickers as a nutrition education media. Global Conferences Series: Sciences and Technology. 3. 9–17. https://doi.org/10.32698/tech3228
Ferrara. M.. Roberto. A. J.. & Witte. K. (2012). Managing Fear to Promote Healthy Change. In R. Obregon & S. Waisbord (Eds.). The Handbook of Global Health Communication (1st ed.. pp. 274–287). John Wiley & Sons. Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118241868.ch13
Gilbert. G. E.. & Prion. S. (2016). Making Sense of Methods and Measurement: Lawshe’s Content Validity Index. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 12(12). 530–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.08.002
Juffrie. M.. Helmyati. S.. & Hakimi. M. (2020). Nutritional anemia in Indonesia children and adolescents: Diagnostic reliability for appropriate management. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 29(December). 18–31. https://doi.org/10.6133/APJCN.202012_29(S1).03
Lawshe. C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach To Content Validity. Personnel Psychology. 28(4). 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Lenzner. T.. Hadler. P.. & Neuert. C. (2023). An Experimental Test Of The Effectiveness Of Cognitive Interviewing In Pretesting Questionnaires. Quality and Quantity. 57(4). 3199–3217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01489-4
Locke. E. A.. & Bandura. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology.
Malik. I. S.. & Hasan. M. (2026). Mastering Content Validation: A Guide to Calculating the Content Validity Index (CVI). Educational Quest- An International Journal of Education and Applied Social Sciences. 17(1). 21–27. https://doi.org/10.30954/2230-7311.1.2026.3
Miles. A. (2007a). Perceived Severity. Behavioral Research Program. 1(1). 1–8.
Miles. A. (2007b). Perceived Severity General. Behav Res Progr. 1(1). 1–8.
Milne. E. (2016). What is public health? In Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom). https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdw137
Milne. S.. Sheeran. P.. & Orbell. S. (2000). Prediction and Intervention in Health-Related Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review of Protection Motivation Theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 30(1). 106–143.
Napper. L. E.. Fisher. D. G.. & Reynolds. G. L. (2012). Development of the perceived risk of HIV scale. AIDS and Behavior. 16(4). 1075–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-011-0003-2
National Institutes of Health. (2011). Your Guide to Anemia: Healthy Lifestyle Changes. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. 11–7629. 1–63. file:///C:/Users/Courtney/Downloads/Introduction to Anemia _NIH.pdf
Polit. D. F.. Beck. C. T.. & Owen. S. V. (2007). Focus on Research Methods: Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health. 30. 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
Popova. L. (2012). The Extended Parallel Process Model: Illuminating the Gaps in Research. Health Education and Behavior. 39(4). 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198111418108
Prananto. I. W.. Rakhmawati. Y.. & Pamungkas. T. (2022). Content Validity Ratio (CVR). Content Validity Index (CVI). and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Mathematics Learning Independence Instruments. Kontinu: Jurnal Penelitian Didaktik Matematika. 6(2). 116–132. https://doi.org/10.56304/s0040363622080021
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2019). Undang-undang No. 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan (pp. 1–5). Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. https://pa-purwodadi.go.id/images/pdf/lain2/UU-No.-16-Tahun-2019.pdf
Riskesdas. (2018). Riset Kesehatan Dasar 2018. Kementrian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. https://doi.org/1 Desember 2013
Riskesdas Kalsel. (2018). Laporan Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan RISEKDAS. In Laporan Riskesdas Nasional 2019. https://ejournal2.litbang.kemkes.go.id/index.php/lpb/issue/view/253
Ruiter. R. A. C.. Verplanken. B.. Cremer. D. De. & Kok. G. (2004). Danger and Fear Control in Response to Fear Appeals: The Role of Need for Cognition. Basic And Applied Social Psychology. 26(1). 13–24.
Schwarzer. R.. & Warner. L. M. (2013). Perceived Self-Efficacy and its Relationship to Resilience. Resilience in Children. Adolescents. and Adults. 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4939-3_10
Setyobudihono. S.. Istiqomah. E.. Santi. E.. Santia Dewi. R.. & Azra Inan Abdillah. M. (2020). Factors of Adolescent Girls’ Knowledge in the Prevention of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Banjarbaru. Indonesia. IAKMI Public Health Journal Indonesia. 1(2). 67–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46366/iphji.1.2.67-74
Sukeri. S.. Zahiruddin. W. M.. Shafei. M. N.. Hamat. R. A.. Osman. M.. Jamaluddin. T. Z. M. T.. & Daud. A. B. (2020). Perceived severity and susceptibility towards leptospirosis infection in Malaysia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17(17). 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176362
Ugli. S. A. F. (2024). Psycho-emotional conditions in young people with anemia. Texas Journal of Medical Science. 32(May). 87–88. https://doi.org/10.62480/tjms.2024.vol32.pp87-88
Waddington. J. (2023). Self-efficacy. ELT Journal. 77(April). 237–240.
WHO. (UNICEF). U. N. C. F.. Fund. U. N. P.. Bank. W.. & United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. P. D. (2025). Trends in maternal mortality estimates 2000 to 2023: estimates by WHO. UNICEF. UNFPA. World Bank Group and UNDESA. In World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/381012
Witte. K.. Meyer. G.. Martell. D. (2001). Effective Health Risk Messages: A Step-By-Step Guide. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.ps/books?id=KL11AwAAQBAJ
Witte. K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs. 59(December). 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276
Witte. K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs. 61(2). 113–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759409376328
Witte. K.. & Allen. M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education and Behavior. 27(5). 591–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810002700506
Yang. Y. Y.. & Delgado. M. R. (2025). The Integration of Self-Efficacy and Response-Efficacy in Decision Making. Scientific Reports. 15(1). 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85577-z
Yoon. H.. You. M.. & Shon. C. (2022). An Application of The Extended Parallel Process Model To Protective Behaviors Against COVID-19 in South Korea. PLoS ONE. 17(3 March). 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261132
Zhang. W.. Xiong. S.. Zheng. Y.. & Wu. J. (2022). Response Efficacy and Self-Efficacy Mediated the Relationship between Perceived Threat and Psychic Anxiety among College Students in the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Joirnal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.854698